By Japan Meteorological Agency (satellite), Digital Typhoon (website) - 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Haʻapai Eruption, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=139129220
By Japan Meteorological Agency (satellite), Digital Typhoon (website) - 2022 Hunga Tonga-Hunga Haʻapai Eruption, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=139129220

Tongan volcano may have exploded because it couldn't pass gas

Embargoed until: Publicly released:
Peer-reviewed: This work was reviewed and scrutinised by relevant independent experts.

A new study of the 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption has proposed that a gaseous seal created pressure which led to the massive explosion that was felt worldwide. The energy required to bring such a large ash cloud from beneath the waves and into the atmosphere must have been comparable to the 1883 Krakatoa explosion, and if the authors are correct, this gas-seal buildup trigger could be found in all Plinean (explosive) eruptions. If this is true, it means that early warning systems could be trained to detect a lack of leaking gasses, suggesting that a build-up and explosion is underway.

Journal/conference: Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research

Link to research (DOI): 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108077

Organisation/s: GNS Science, The Australian National University

Funder: Cornell de Ronde reports financial support was provided by New Zealand Strategic Science Investment Fund.

Media release

From: GNS Science

New research challenges current assumptions of Hunga (Tonga) eruption trigger

A newly published study in the international Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research offers an alternative mechanism that triggered the 15 January 2022 Hunga (Tonga) eruption, proposing the powerful eruption was caused by a gas-driven climatic explosion rather than a phreatomagmatic one - where magma and water react violently through the water column.

The paper, led by the Australian National University in collaboration with GNS Science, presents a new evidence-based model that describes how the formation of a gas seal led to the amassing and release of enough explosive energy within minutes to form a 58 km high ash plume, a crater deeper than the Burj Khalifa Tower (Dubai) is high and atmospheric shock waves that promulgated the entire planet. The authors Richard Henley, Richard Arculus, Thanh-Son Pham, Ana Casas (ANU), Cornel de Ronde (GNS), Graham Hughes (Imperial College), Vasily Titov and Sharon Walker (NOAA) contend a gas-driven trigger is probable based on the eruption magnitude, the time sequence of the event, the mass amounts of volcanic gas release, the remaining volcano structure and the presence of minerals formed through magmatic gas interactions with the surrounding rock (e.g. sulphate minerals).

“What we witnessed during this event was a Plinean eruption. These are the kind most people think of when imagining an erupting volcano – very intense, violent and sudden with extremely high ash columns,” said lead author Henley.

For a submarine volcano to release enough energy through the water column to create this immense plume as well as a globally-felt atmospheric air blast and a mega-tsunami, would take a colossal amount of force, similar or even larger than that of the 1883 Krakatoa eruption.

“Our model describes a process that explains how the accumulation of volcanic gases over the months leading up to the eruption could generate this scale of explosive energy,” said Henley.

The paper hypothesises the eruption sequence as follows: a fluctuation of magma-derived reactive gases aggressively alters the rocks in the volcano core, creating a seal that blocks gas flow to the surface → this increases the internal gas pressure and puts stress on the volcanic structure → the seal fractures, leading to an explosive release of compressed gas → the crater enlarges and the deepening enables run-away gas explosion through releasing higher and higher pressure gas from the porous rock mass → the eruption declines as the compressed gas depletes and seawater backfills the crater.

The proposed model is further supported by numerical modelling that calculates the potential energy of the trapped  compressed gas matches independent observations of the scale of the eruption.

“Not only does the paper suggest that the Hunga Plinean eruption was gas-driven but proposes that this mechanism may be characteristic of all Plinean eruptions regardless of whether the volcano is oceanic or subaerial. If correct, a pause in gas discharge may act as a precursor of a large eruption event,” said Henley.

“Understanding the cause of the eruption is important for volcano monitoring and risk preparedness, not just for the Tongan archipelago but for the numerous submarine volcanoes that sit within New Zealand’s maritime estate. The eruption at Hunga has opened our eyes,” said GNS co- author de Ronde.

To further investigate the evidence supporting Henley et al.’s theory and other potential warning signs of an upcoming eruption, GNS Science will lead an international marine voyage from 14 May to 12 June to Hunga Volcano to collect geological, geophysical and water column data inside the crater and over the flanks of the submerged eruption vent.

More details on the voyage will be released shortly.

News for:

Australia
New Zealand
Pacific

Media contact details for this story are only visible to registered journalists.